Fall 2005
|
|
PROFICIENT |
ACCEPTABLE |
NEEDS TO IMPROVE |
|
LESSON PLAN |
|
|
|
|
Overview |
Is
concise and unusually well considered, offering not only a preview of the
lesson’s content but also a sound rationale for its inclusion in the
curriculum. |
Is concise and generally well considered, offering
not only a preview of the lesson’s content but also a reasonable rationale
for its inclusion in the curriculum. |
Is
sketchy rather than concise, failing to offer either a preview of the
lesson’s content or any logical rationale for its inclusion in the
curriculum. |
|
Context |
Provides
a concise description of an appropriate context for the lesson, identifying
the lesson’s logical place in the curriculum and the progress of student
learning. |
Provides a reasonably concise description of a
logical context for the lesson, identifying an appropriate place for the
lesson in the curriculum and the progress of student learning. |
Fails
to provide a description of an appropriate context for the lesson, and/or
fails to identify and appropriate place for the lesson in the curriculum and
the progress of student learning. |
|
Theory to Practice |
Demonstrates
that the teacher has not only read widely and understood relevant research
and/or theory, but is also able to make the leap from that reading to sound
pedagogical practice. |
Demonstrates
that the teacher has not only read and understood relevant research and/or
theory, but is also able to make the leap from that reading to sound
pedagogical practice. |
Suggests
that the teacher has either not read or not understood relevant research and/or theory; thus, s/he is
unable to make the leap from such reading to sound pedagogical practice. |
Resources |
The
teacher’s resources are clearly identified in a manner that makes them easily
accessible to others who might want to access them. |
The
teacher’s resources are identified in a manner that makes them fairly
accessible to others who might want to access them. |
The
teacher’s resources not identified or are so identified so vaguely that they
are essentially inaccessible to others who might want to access them. |
|
Standards |
Demonstrates
that the teacher is able to precisely identify specific, relevant standards
addressed by the lesson. |
Demonstrate
that the teacher is generally able to identify specific, relevant standards
addressed by the lesson. |
Suggest
that the teacher is unwilling or unable to
identify specific, relevant standards addressed by the lesson. |
|
Learning Goals |
Consistently
demonstrate the teacher’s ability to design specific objectives that are
clear, concise, relevant, achievable and measurable. |
Generally
demonstrate the teacher’s ability to design specific objectives that are
clear, concise, relevant, achievable & measurable. |
Suggest
that the teacher is unwilling or unable to design specific objectives that
are clear, concise, relevant, achievable & measurable. |
|
Preparation |
Clearly
identifies everything that must be done in advance to help the lesson
progress smoothly. |
Identifies
almost everything that must be done in advance to help the lesson progress
smoothly. |
Fails
to identify a significant portion of the work that must be done in advance to
help the lesson progress smoothly. |
|
Materials |
Clearly
identifies all materials that must be provided in order to ensure the
lesson’s success. Provides examples
of materials when necessary. |
Clearly
identifies most materials that must be provided in order to ensure the
lesson’s success. Provides examples
of materials when necessary. |
Fails
to identify some necessary materials and/or fails to provide examples of
materials when necessary. |
|
Activities |
The
lesson provides a seamless flow of
instructional, participatory, and interactive activities that foster and
maintain student engagement while contributing to student learning. |
The
lesson provides a logical progression of instructional, participatory, and
interactive activities that foster and maintain student engagement while
contributing to student learning. |
The
lesson is comprised of a series of activities that have little or no clear
relation to each other; activities may be teacher-centered, failing to foster
and maintain student engagement while contributing to student learning. |
|
Time |
Consistently
demonstrates the author’s ability to plan realistically so that the lesson is
neither too long nor too short. |
Generally
demonstrates the author’s ability to plan realistically so that the lesson is
neither too long nor too short. |
Suggests
that the author is unwilling or unable to
plan realistically, often resulting in lessons that are either too
long nor too short. |
|
Evaluation |
The
plan identifies an innovative, appropriate method of summative or formative
assessment and/or an opportunity for students to reflect upon their own
learning/ progress. Assessment/reflection is integrated seamlessly into the
experience of the lesson. |
The
plan identifies an appropriate method of summative or formative assessment
and/or an opportunity for students to reflect upon their own
learning/progress.
Assessment/reflection is a logical extension of the lesson. |
The
plan fails to identify an appropriate method of summative or formative
assessment and/or any opportunity for students to reflect upon their own
learning/progress. |
|
DELIVERY |
|
|
|
|
Enthusiasm |
Demeanor
suggests a real enthusiasm for and engagement with both topic and audience |
Demeanor
suggests an effort to maintain an appropriate level of engagement with and
enthusiasm for the topic and/or audience |
Demeanor
suggests a lack of enthusiasm for or engagement with topic and/or audience |
Comfort level |
Demeanor
suggests that the candidate is able to address a group with confidence and
ease |
Demeanor
suggests candidate is able to overcome initial reluctance or discomfort at addressing group |
Demeanor
suggests that the candidate is uncomfortable
speaking to a group |
|
Eye contact |
Candidate
consistently makes natural and appropriate eye contact with apparent ease |
Candidate
makes an effort to maintain appropriate eye contact and is at least partially
successful |
Candidate
demonstrates an unwillingness or inability to maintain appropriate eye
contact |
|
Movement |
Candidate
is consistently willing and able to utilize available space appropriately,
move naturally, gesture naturally, and avoid distracting mannerisms |
Candidate
makes a generally successful effort to utilize available space appropriately,
move naturally, gesture naturally, and avoid distracting mannerisms |
Candidate
appears unwilling or unable to utilize available space appropriately, move
naturally, gesture naturally, and avoid distracting mannerisms |
|
Professional Appearance |
Teacher
is dressed and groomed in a professional manner. |
Teacher
is dressed and groomed in a generally professional manner. |
Teacher
is not dressed or groomed in a professional manner. |
|
Mechanics (volume/rate/ diction) |
Candidate
is consistently –apparently effortlessly- able to identify and exhibit an
appropriate volume and speaking rate; choose appropriate words; and enunciate
clearly |
Candidate
makes a generally successful effort to identify and exhibit an appropriate
volume and speaking rate; choose appropriate words; and enunciate clearly |
Candidate
appears unwilling or unable to identify and exhibit an appropriate volume and
speaking rate; choose appropriate words; and enunciate clearly |
|
REFLECTION |
|
|
|
What? |
The
reflection offers a detailed, coherent discussion of the experience,
demonstrating the ability to observe carefully, keep thorough records, and
translate those into narrative form.
|
The reflection offers a well-developed, coherent
description of the experience, suggesting the ability to observe carefully
and keep a careful record of those observations. |
The
reflection suggests an inability or unwillingness to conduct and report
detailed observations. |
So What? |
The
reflection offers a consistently thoughtful, even insightful discussion of
the ways in which the experience relates to the content of the methods course
(ENG 297) and the author’s pre-existing knowledge and assumptions about
responding to student writing. |
The
reflection offers a well-developed, coherent discussion of the ways in which
the experience relates to the content of the methods course (ENG 297) and the
author’s pre-existing knowledge and assumptions about responding to student
writing. |
The
reflection suggests an inability or unwillingness to consider how the
observation relates to either the content of the methods course (ENG 297) or
the author’s pre-existing knowledge and assumptions about responding to student
writing. |
|
Now What? |
The
reflection offers a consistently thoughtful, even insightful discussion of
the ways in which the experience might influence the author’s future
learning, observation, or pedagogical practice. |
The
reflection offers a well-developed, coherent discussion of the ways in which
the experience might influence the author’s future learning, observation, or
pedagogical practice. |
The
reflection suggests an inability or unwillingness to consider how the
experience might influence the author’s future learning, observation, or
pedagogical practice. |
|
Organization |
The
reflection is so well organized that the audience is scarcely aware of its
organizational and/or structural elements.
They seem to be simply another logical part of an organic whole. |
The
reflection is generally well organized, making it easily accessible to its
audience. |
The
reflection lacks the kind of organization that makes it easily accessible to
its audience. |
|
Style |
The
reflection is stylistically sophisticated, suggesting that the writer can
revise adeptly at the local level, resulting in strong--even
engaging--syntax, diction, voice, tone, and so on. |
The
reflection is stylistically sound, suggesting that the writer can revise
competently at the local level, paying careful attention to issues such as
syntax, diction, voice, tone, and so on. |
The
reflection contains stylistic elements that suggest a lack of local revision
and careful attention to issues such as syntax, diction, voice, tone, and so
on. |
|
Correctness |
The
reflection is virtually free of mechanical or grammatical errors,
demonstrating a careful attention to editing and proofreading, upholding
—even contributing to—the author’s
ethos as a writing teacher. |
The
reflection is generally free of distracting mechanical or grammatical errors,
suggesting careful attention to editing and proofreading and never
undermining the author’s ethos as a writing teacher. |
The
reflection contains a number of mechanical or grammatical errors, suggesting
a lack of attention to editing and proofreading and undermining the author’s
ethos as a writing teacher. |
COMMENTS: